What wild camping actually costs you in Switzerland
Almost every page that answers this question gives the same range, CHF 200 to 2,000, and attributes it to the commune. Having now read the actual rulebooks for 48 spots, we can say that range is wrong at both ends.
The number is decided by which law catches you, not by where you slept. Five different instruments can bite, they sit on top of each other, and their figures are nowhere near each other. At one end, a whole canton where camping carries no penalty at all because the articles were repealed in 2005.1 At the other, a ceiling of CHF 50,000 under cantonal nature-protection law.2 The commune is only one of the five.
First, the distinction that makes every published number misleading
Nearly every figure you will read, including most of the ones below, is a ceiling and not a price. Swiss regulations are written as "Busse bis zu Fr. 5000", a maximum the authority may impose. It is the top of a range that starts near zero, and it exists for the worst case the drafters could imagine, which is usually not one person with a bivvy bag.
A tariff is a different thing. A fixed-penalty tariff is a set amount for a set offence, handed over on the spot without a court. There are far fewer of these, and they are the numbers that actually predict what leaves your wallet. Camping inside a federal hunting-ban district is one: CHF 150, fixed, federal.3 Grindelwald has a ceiling of CHF 1,000 in its camping reglement but applies about CHF 200 in practice.4 Zermatt works out at roughly CHF 200 per tent.5
So when a site tells you wild camping costs "up to CHF 5,000", it is quoting a ceiling and implying a price. The honest version is that most people who are caught and fined pay somewhere between CHF 100 and CHF 200, and the four-figure numbers exist for cases with damage, fire, repetition or a group.
The five instruments, cheapest to most expensive
1. Nothing at all. This is more common than the guides suggest. Appenzell Innerrhoden repealed the penalty articles of its camping ordinance in 2005, so there is no cantonal camping fine there, which is why the Fälensee and the Seealpsee come out the way they do.1 Uri has no camping ban. Glarus has no cantonal camping norm. Nidwalden has no on-the-spot camping fine anywhere. In those places the question is not how much, it is whether any norm exists to break, and often none does.
2. The communal camping or police reglement. The usual suspect, and the widest spread. Vals writes an actual range, CHF 50 to 500, rising to CHF 1,000 on repetition.6 Kandersteg lists CHF 200 in its fine schedule. Grindelwald caps at CHF 1,000. Lauterbrunnen, Brienz and Schwanden all cap at CHF 5,000.7 These apply across the whole commune, private ground included, at any altitude.
3. The federal hunting-ban districts. A flat CHF 150 fixed penalty for free camping inside one.3 That is cheap as a tariff, but the ceiling behind it is not: the federal Hunting Act allows up to CHF 20,000, and this is federal law, so no cantonal or communal permission reaches inside the boundary. Several of our forbidden verdicts sit here rather than on a communal rule.
4. Cantonal nature protection. Where the big numbers live. The Bern Nature Protection Act reaches CHF 50,000, which is the highest figure anywhere in our corpus and the one that decides the Engstlensee.2 Silvaplana reaches CHF 30,000 through building law rather than camping law.8 Nobody is fining a hiker CHF 30,000, but the reason these are worth knowing is that they tell you the spot is protected for reasons that have nothing to do with camping, and enforcement there is taken seriously.
5. The richterliches Verbot, which is not a fine at all. At the Oeschinensee the bivouac is covered by a court-backed prohibition posted by the landowner. Rangers cannot fine you under it, which people read as permission. It is not: it is a different route, through a court, and the consequence arrives later rather than on the spot.9
The two things that cost more than the camping
Fire is consistently more expensive than the tent. The Glarus forest act carries up to CHF 20,000 for fire offences, at spots where camping itself attracts no cantonal penalty at all.10 That asymmetry runs through the whole corpus: a commune that shrugs at a bivvy bag will not shrug at a fire ring, and forest and fire law applies in places where camping law does not.
Litter is the other one. It is finable more or less anywhere in Switzerland regardless of whether camping is, and in Appenzell, where there is no camping fine, littering still carries CHF 100.11 If you are looking for the realistic risk of a night out, it is not usually the sleeping. It is the fire and what you leave behind.
What you actually risk on a normal night
Put the ceilings aside and the practical picture is narrow. If a spot has no norm, nothing happens, because there is nothing to enforce. If it has a communal reglement and you are found, the realistic outcome is being asked to pack up, and a fine in the region of CHF 100 to 200 if the person who found you decides to write one. If you are inside a federal hunting-ban district, it is CHF 150 and the person writing it has no discretion to waive it.
The four and five-figure numbers are real, they are in force, and they are almost never what happens to a single considerate camper. They become relevant with fire, damage, groups, repetition, or a protected area where the point was never the camping.
Which is why the useful question is not "how much is the fine in Switzerland". It is "which instrument covers this specific piece of ground", because that single answer sets both whether you are breaking anything and what the number would be.
Six spots, six very different numbers
All six are researched to a named article. The spread is not about how remote they are or how high they sit. It is entirely about which law happens to reach them.
-
The canton repealed the penalty articles of its camping ordinance in 2005. There is no cantonal camping fine to impose. The route here is the alp tenant's consent and a few francs per night.1
-
Milchspüelersee, GlarusCHF 150
Inside the federal Kärpf reserve, so it is the federal fixed penalty for free camping in a hunting-ban district. A tariff, not a ceiling: this is what you pay.3
-
Stellisee, ZermattAbout CHF 200
Zermatt's police regulation of 2022 bans camping commune-wide. About CHF 200 per tent in practice, plus cleaning and operation costs where they arise.5
-
Guraletschsee, ValsCHF 50 to 500
One of the few communes that writes a genuine range rather than a ceiling, rising to CHF 1,000 on repetition. And it exempts the tentless bivouac by name.6
-
Lauterbrunnen, BernUp to CHF 5,000
A camping reglement in force since 1 January 2025, reaching the whole municipality. A ceiling rather than a tariff, but a serious one, and the commune meant it.7
-
Engstlensee, BernUp to CHF 50,000
Not a camping fine at all. This is the cantonal Nature Protection Act, and it is the highest figure anywhere in our 48-spot corpus.2
Why the CHF 200 to 2,000 range keeps getting repeated
Because it is roughly right for the middle of the distribution, and checking the ends is expensive. It means reading a communal police regulation from 1974, a federal ordinance annex, and a cantonal nature-protection act, per spot, and most of those documents are not indexed, some are scans without a text layer, and a few are published through scripts that serve an empty page to anything but a browser. We have now done that for 48 spots. The range that came out of it was nothing to CHF 50,000.
How much is the fine for wild camping in Switzerland?
Is there a fixed fine anywhere?
Which canton has the highest wild camping fine?
Are there places in Switzerland with no camping fine at all?
Do rangers issue the fines?
Is a fire treated the same as a tent?
Sources
- Appenzell Innerrhoden repealed the penalty articles of its Campingverordnung in 2005, which is why no cantonal camping fine exists in the canton today. The lawful route at the Fälensee is the alp tenant's consent, which the Campingverordnung permits. Read in full for our Fälensee and Seealpsee reports. our Fälensee report. ↩
- Kanton Bern, Naturschutzgesetz (BSG 426.11), Art. 57. The penalty provision behind our Engstlensee verdict, and the highest figure anywhere in our 48-spot corpus. A cantonal nature-protection ceiling, not a camping fine. our Engstlensee report. ↩
- Ordnungsbussenverordnung (OBV, SR 314.11), Anhang 2 Ziff. 12005: free camping in a federal hunting-ban district, CHF 150. The underlying prohibition is Verordnung über die eidgenössischen Jagdbanngebiete (VEJ, SR 922.31) Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. e, and the ceiling under the federal Hunting Act (JSG, SR 922.0) Art. 18 is CHF 20,000. fedlex.admin.ch. ↩
- Einwohnergemeinde Grindelwald, Camping-Reglement, Art. 9 and Art. 10. Breaches are punished with a fine up to Fr. 1000.00, a ceiling rather than a range; about CHF 200 is what the commune applies in practice. Read by OCR, since the published PDF is a scan with no text layer. gemeinde-grindelwald.ch. ↩
- Gemeinde Zermatt, Polizeireglement of 2022, Art. 43: camping outside authorised sites is prohibited across the communal territory. About CHF 200 per tent in practice, plus cleaning and operation costs where they arise. Read for our Stellisee and Riffelsee reports. our Stellisee report, with the article text. ↩
- Polizeiverordnung der Gemeinde Vals, in force since 1 May 1974, Art. 7 and Art. 18: camping outside designated places is forbidden across the whole communal territory, public and private ground alike, fine CHF 50 to 500, up to CHF 1,000 on repetition. Art. 7 closes with an express exception for a bivouac in the course of individual mountain tours. our Guraletschsee report, with the article text. ↩
- Einwohnergemeinde Lauterbrunnen, Camping-Reglement 551.4, header "Camping Reglement ab 01.01.2025". Art. 3 Abs. 1 prohibits camping outside campsites, with an outright exception for isolated camping on private ground for private purposes. Art. 24 Abs. 2: breaches of Art. 3 are fined by the Gemeinderat with up to Fr. 5000. lauterbrunnen.ch. ↩
- Gemeinde Silvaplana: no cantonal camping ban exists in Graubünden, and the commune reaches up to CHF 30,000 through cantonal building law rather than camping law. Read in full for our Silvaplanersee report. our Silvaplanersee report. ↩
- Oeschinensee: the tent question is settled by the Kandersteg Gemeindepolizeireglement Art. 7 Campingverbot, while the bivouac at the lake is covered by a richterliches Verbot, a court-backed prohibition posted by the landowner. Rangers have no power to fine under it, which is regularly misread as permission. our Oeschinensee report. ↩
- Kanton Glarus, Waldgesetz, Art. 37: fire offences up to CHF 20,000, at spots where camping itself carries no cantonal penalty because Glarus has no camping norm. Read for our Klöntalersee and Fessisee reports. our Klöntalersee report. ↩
- Appenzell Innerrhoden: littering carries CHF 100 even though no camping fine exists in the canton. Read for our Meglisalp report. our Meglisalp report. ↩