Where wild camping is actually forbidden in Switzerland
Lists of banned places go stale and are never complete. What does not go stale is the small set of legal instruments those bans are written in, because almost every prohibition in the country is one of four things.
Four instruments do nearly all the work. A communal camping or police regulation, a federal hunting-ban district, a cantonal or communal nature reserve, and the court-backed prohibition. Across the 48 spots we have researched one at a time, 15 came out forbidden, and every one of them is forbidden by one of those four. None of them are forbidden by anything called a wild camping law, because Switzerland does not have one.
1. The communal camping or police regulation
The most common, and the one you cannot see from the trail. A Swiss commune can prohibit camping across its entire territory, private ground included, and a lot of them have. There is no central register of which ones, which is exactly why this is the instrument that catches people.
Kandersteg does it at Art. 7 of its police regulation, in force since 2021, and that single article is why the Oeschinensee is out.1 Grindelwald does it at Art. 9 of its camping reglement, with no exception for being above the treeline, which is what decides the Bachalpsee, First and the Faulhorn.2 Lauterbrunnen brought one in on 1 January 2025 reaching the whole municipality.3 Zermatt does it at Art. 43, which is why both the Riffelsee and the Stellisee are prohibited despite sitting well above 2,500 metres.4
Ceilings run from a few hundred francs to CHF 5,000. What is actually applied is usually CHF 100 to 200. The important part is not the number, it is that these rules apply at any altitude inside the boundary, and that neighbouring communes frequently disagree, so the answer can flip when you cross a ridge.
2. The federal hunting-ban districts
Free camping inside a federal hunting-ban district is prohibited by federal ordinance. The cantons may grant exceptions; a commune or a landowner cannot.5 That is the practical difference from everything else on this page: there is nobody local to ask.
The fixed penalty is CHF 150, and unlike most Swiss camping figures this is a tariff rather than a ceiling, so it is what you would actually pay.6 The ceiling behind it under the federal Hunting Act is CHF 20,000.
These districts are drawn around high alpine terrain, so they overlap heavily with exactly the ground people assume is free. The Hagelseewli and the Tannhorn are inside the Schwarzhorn and Augstmatthorn districts, and the Milchspüelersee sits deep inside the Freiberg Kärpf, the oldest federal game reserve in the country.7 Wildlife rest zones are a separate instrument with a separate tariff, and they bite only during their protection period, which is usually winter into spring.
3. Cantonal and communal nature reserves
This is where the largest numbers live, and they have nothing to do with camping law. The Engstlensee and its shores are inside a cantonal reserve created by a 2012 decree that bans tents and bivouac year round, with the penalty ceiling coming from the Bern Nature Protection Act at CHF 50,000.8 That is the highest figure anywhere in our corpus.
Reserves can also be tiny and communal. The summit of the Gnipen is a protection zone listed as a single object, a mountain meadow with significant orchid populations, and the Arth protection ordinance forbids camping there specifically.9 Nothing about the terrain tells you that.
The useful signal: if the reason a place is protected has nothing to do with camping, enforcement tends to be more serious rather than less, because someone is already watching that ground for other reasons.
4. The court-backed prohibition, which is not a fine
The least understood of the four. A landowner can obtain a richterliches Verbot, a prohibition backed by a court and posted on the ground. It is not a police regulation and rangers cannot write you a ticket under it.
People read that as tolerance. It is not: it is a different route, through a court, and the consequence arrives later instead of on the spot. At the Oeschinensee this is what covers the tentless bivouac, closing the gap the communal tent ban leaves, up to CHF 2,000.1 At the Limmernsee a court order obtained by the power company with the commune covers the two land parcels that make up the whole basin, so the lake, both dams and every shore bench sit inside it.10
There is a field test for the sign. A genuine court prohibition names the court, the date, the case number and a franc amount. A plain "camping verboten" board without those is the landowner telling you consent is refused, which matters under the access rule but is a different thing from a court order.
How to check a spot that is not on any list
Work the four in order of how much ground they cover. First, which commune is this, and does it have a camping or police regulation. Second, does the spot fall inside a federal hunting-ban district or a wildlife rest zone in its protection period. Third, is there a cantonal or communal reserve over it. Fourth, is there a posted prohibition on the ground itself.
If all four come back empty, nothing prohibits you, and our own verdicts say so plainly rather than hedging. That is how 9 of our 48 spots came out legal. The work is in the checking, not in the conclusion.
Fifteen verified as forbidden, and which instrument does it
Every one of these is read to the named article, not inferred from a tourism page. Dated August 2026; communes do change these, so the date on each report is part of the answer.
-
Oeschinensee, BECommunal + court
Kandersteg police regulation Art. 7 for the tent, and a court-backed prohibition at the lake for the bivouac. Up to CHF 5,000 and CHF 2,000 respectively.1
-
Bachalpsee, BECommunal
Grindelwald camping reglement Art. 9, municipality-wide with no above-treeline exception. Up to CHF 1,000, and up to CHF 20,000 in the hunting-ban district.2
-
Stellisee and Riffelsee, VSCommunal
Zermatt police regulation Art. 43 covers the whole commune including the mountain lakes. About CHF 200 per tent plus operation costs.4
-
Milchspüelersee, GLFederal
Deep inside the Freiberg Kärpf. A federal offence at CHF 150 fixed penalty, and no landowner can wave it through.7
-
Engstlensee, BENature reserve
Cantonal reserve by decree of 2012, tents and bivouac banned year round. Ceiling CHF 50,000 under the Bern Nature Protection Act, the highest in our corpus.8
-
Limmernsee, GLCourt order
A court order over the two parcels that make up the entire basin. Up to CHF 2,000, on complaint only.10
Why we do not publish a map of banned areas
Because a map would be wrong within a season and confidently so. Communes amend these regulations on their own schedule and mostly without announcement: Lauterbrunnen's reglement came into force on 1 January 2025 and changed the answer for a whole valley overnight. A dated per-spot report can be re-checked and corrected. A pin on a country map cannot, and it would be read as a guarantee. The four instruments above are the part that stays true.
Is there a list of places where wild camping is banned in Switzerland?
What is the most common reason a Swiss spot is off limits?
Can a landowner give me permission inside a federal hunting-ban district?
What does a court-backed prohibition sign look like?
Does above the treeline make any difference?
Sources
- Einwohnergemeinde Kandersteg, Gemeindepolizeireglement, Art. 7 Campingverbot, in force since 2021, with CHF 200 in the commune's own fine schedule and a ceiling of CHF 5,000. At the lake a richterliches Verbot obtained by the landowner additionally covers the tentless bivouac, up to CHF 2,000. Read in full for our Oeschinensee report. our Oeschinensee report. ↩
- Einwohnergemeinde Grindelwald, Camping-Reglement, Art. 9 prohibition and Art. 10 permit route, fine up to CHF 1,000 with about CHF 200 applied in practice, municipality-wide and with no above-treeline exception. The published PDF is a scan with no text layer and was read by OCR. gemeinde-grindelwald.ch. ↩
- Einwohnergemeinde Lauterbrunnen, Camping-Reglement 551.4, in force 1 January 2025, municipality-wide, Art. 24 Abs. 2 fine up to CHF 5,000, with Art. 3 Abs. 1 excepting isolated camping on private ground for private purposes. lauterbrunnen.ch. ↩
- Gemeinde Zermatt, Polizeireglement of 2022, Art. 43: camping outside authorised sites is prohibited across the communal territory, mountain lakes included. About CHF 200 per tent plus cleaning and operation costs. Read for our Stellisee and Riffelsee reports. our Stellisee report. ↩
- Verordnung über die eidgenössischen Jagdbanngebiete (VEJ, SR 922.31), Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. e: free tenting and camping are prohibited, official campsites excepted, and the cantons may permit exceptions. The ceiling under the federal Hunting Act (JSG, SR 922.0) Art. 18 is CHF 20,000. fedlex.admin.ch. ↩
- Ordnungsbussenverordnung (OBV, SR 314.11), Anhang 2 Ziff. 12005: free camping in a federal hunting-ban district, CHF 150. Ziff. 12003 covers entering a wildlife rest zone and is a separate offence with a separate tariff. fedlex.admin.ch. ↩
- Freiberg Kärpf, the oldest federal game reserve in Switzerland, covering the Milchspüelersee; and the federal districts Schwarzhorn and Augstmatthorn covering the Hagelseewli and the Tannhorn. Perimeters verified against an invalid-layer control for each report. our Milchspüelersee report. ↩
- Cantonal nature reserve Engstlensee-Jungibäche-Achtelsass, decree of 2012, banning tents and bivouac year round; penalty ceiling from the Kanton Bern Naturschutzgesetz (BSG 426.11) Art. 57 at CHF 50,000. our Engstlensee report. ↩
- Gemeinde Arth, Schutzverordnung, Art. 6 Abs. 2 lit. f, covering protection object T2 Gnipen, a mountain meadow with major orchid populations. Ceiling CHF 10,000, no on-the-spot tariff. our Gnipen report. ↩
- Limmernsee: a court order obtained by the power company together with the commune covers the two land parcels making up the entire basin, so the lake, both dams, the Muttsee and every shore bench sit inside it. Up to CHF 2,000, prosecuted on complaint only. our Limmernsee report. ↩